NestJS vs. NextJS: Differences and Use Cases from a CTO’s Perspective

NestJS is a solo backend framework. It is a Node.js framework designed to make server-side development cleaner and more efficient. Inspired by Spring Boot, NestJS is built with a strong architectural foundation. It is an excellent choice for both monolithic and microservices architectures. If I had only three words to describe NestJS, they would be: structured, scalable, and easy to maintain.
​

NestJS runs on TypeScript. It allows developers to share validation logic, business rules, and even entire data models between the frontend and backend.
​
​That means fewer inconsistencies, less duplicate work, and a smoother development process overall. Plus, it comes with automatic Swagger documentation and a strong built-in testing ecosystem. So everything stays well-documented and easy to debug. 
​

Generally, CTOs choose NestJS for RESTful APIs, GraphQL APIs, microservices, real-time and enterprise applications. 

NestJS and NextJS serve completely different purposes—even though their names sound kinda similar. So let’s break down the architectural differences.
​

NestJS is strictly a backend framework. If you need to handle complex backend logic, REST APIs, GraphQL APIs, or real-time WebSockets, NestJS is built exactly for that.
​

The key advantage of NestJS’s architecture is its modularity. You start by structuring your app into feature-based modules, which keeps everything clean and makes it easy to scale. Plus, it’s fully compatible with dependency injection. This makes backend development more organized and testable.
​

You can start with a monolithic application and easily transition into microservices later without rewriting everything. That’s a big advantage for companies that want to scale over time without unnecessary refactoring.
​

Nest.js is well-equipped for writing tests, whether for endpoints, unit tests, or integration tests. Everything is already set up for that. A lot of these concepts originally came from Spring and Java. Early microservices were often built in Java using Spring Boot, which is an ideal example of this approach.
​

The key advantage of Nest.js is that you’re using the same technology for both the backend and frontend - JavaScript. This allows easy code-sharing between the frontend and backend, which is exactly what we did in our “Delivery Service App” project.
​

Now, Next.js is a completely different beast. It’s a front-end framework with backend capabilities designed for React-based applications. It’s all about performance, server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), and SEO optimization.
​

Next.js is designed to render web pages efficiently. It lets developers decide whether to pre-render pages (SSG), generate them dynamically on the server (SSR), or just keep everything client-side rendered (CSR). Next.js is a go-to choice for projects where speed and SEO matter.
​

Next.js’s architecture includes built-in API routes. This means you can write some backend logic within a Next.js project without needing a separate backend framework. 
​​
​​​

When it comes to connecting with other systems, NestJS and Next.js take very different approaches. NestJS is designed for API communication and real-time connections. Next.js focuses on frontend performance and API routing, often in a serverless environment.
​

NestJS communicates using REST APIs, but it also supports other protocols:
​

Next.js focuses on efficient data fetching and cloud-based deployments. Next.js allows developers to create simple API endpoints inside the same project. This is a good match for things like form submissions, authentication, and fetching data from an external CMS or database.
​
​However, these API routes aren’t a full replacement for a dedicated backend like NestJS. Next.js is built to work with cloud platforms like Vercel, AWS Lambda, and Google Cloud Functions. So, API routes can be deployed as serverless functions. 

One of the biggest advantages of NestJS is that it’s built on JavaScript (or TypeScript). This means developers can use the same language for both backend and frontend. This simplifies development, especially when working in full-stack environments. It reduces the need to switch between different programming languages.
​

Instead of splitting frontend and backend tasks across many developers, a single developer can own a feature end-to-end. This means they get business requirements directly and don’t have to coordinate with another person.
​

In our project for IKEA, we took full advantage of this by creating a unified validation system that worked across both the frontend and backend. Domain classes and models were written once and reused everywhere. This significantly cut development costs since we weren’t writing duplicate logic in two separate places.
​

For teams following Domain-Driven Design (DDD), NestJS makes life easier by allowing developers to encapsulate logic within domain models or classes that can be used both in the frontend and backend. This means less duplication, faster implementation, and lower long-term costs.
​

Another big advantage is that working with NestJS helps JavaScript developers become full-stack engineers more easily. Since everything runs on JavaScript/TypeScript, frontend devs don’t need to learn Java or another backend language to start working on tasks. This results in faster onboarding and a better understanding of the entire application.
​

From a project management perspective, this also reduces friction. A single developer can take on a full feature (from frontend to backend) without relying on multiple people. This improves prevents communication bottlenecks, API mismatches, and speeds up development.
​

Next.js offers full-stack capabilities. Developers can handle backend logic, API routes, and data fetching within the same project. However, the way developers work with Next.js varies depending on the deployment strategy and the needs of the application.
​

Next.js is often used to build serverless applications, where backend logic is split into serverless functions deployed on platforms like Vercel, AWS Lambda, or Google Cloud Functions.
​
​This allows developers to scale their backend automatically without managing a dedicated server. That said, Next.js itself isn’t inherently serverless—it can also be deployed traditionally on a backend server.

By now, it should be clear that NestJS and Next.js are built for completely different purposes. If you’re choosing between them, it’s not about which one is better—it’s about what your project actually needs.
​

If your focus is backend development, scalable APIs and microservices - NestJS is the right choice.
​

If server-side rendering (SSR), static site generation (SSG), and SEO optimization are critical, Next.js is the way to go.
​

But you can also using both - NestJS as the backend, handling APIs and business logic, and Next.js as the frontend.
​

At Ulan Software, we specialize in developing applications using NestJS and Next.js. We help businesses design backend architectures that are modular, testable, and future-proof.

​We’ve worked with startups and enterprise clients, helping them optimize their development processes, reduce costs, and accelerate time to market. If you're considering NestJS for your next project, let’s talk!